Librarians love nothing more than a quiz, so #ukmedlibs present the first-ever Christmas Twitter quiz, with your quiz mistress @Hollingtonn.
At 8 pm on Tuesday 19th December we’ll unleash a series of questions, one by one, and invite you to submit your answers.
The person with the most correct answers will win a prize, generously donated by Wolters Kluwer. In the event of a tie, we have a tie-breaker prepared.
Inspired by recent exchanges on lis-medical, lis-profession and Medlib-L on the subject of the hashtag #icanhazpdf, used by people asking for copies of papers from scholarly journals, the October chat will discuss the phenomenon variously known as guerilla open access, scholarly piracy or biblioleaks. This is timely: Open Access Week occurs later in the month.
Sharing sites such as SciHub claim to hold over 64.5 million journal articles, freed from paywalls, but publishers take a dim view of their activities and Elsevier and the Amercian Chemical Society (ACS) are suing SciHub.
Questions for discussion:
- Are library users in your organisation using these tools and sites?
- What implications do these tools have for us?
- And what implications do they have for our relationships with publishers?
- What’s the relationship between our campaigns for open access and tools such as these?
- What advice would you give to a library user who asks you if they should use one of these sites?
If you’d like some background reading, try these:
Hoy MB. Sci-Hub: What Librarians Should Know and Do about Article Piracy. Med Ref Serv Q. 2017;36(1):73-8.
Greshake B Looking into Pandora’s Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and its Usage. F1000 Research. 2017;6:541. Available at https://f1000research.com/articles/6-541/v1
Swab M, Romme K Scholarly Sharing via Twitter: #icanhazpdf Requests for Health Sciences Literature. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l’Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada. 2016;37:9-11. Available at https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/jchla/index.php/jchla/article/view/26060/20281
Bohannon J. Who’s downloading pirated papers? Everyone. Science. 2016;352(6285):508-12. Available at http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/352/6285/508.full.pdf
Gardner CC, Gardner G. Bypassing Interlibrary Loan Via Twitter: An Exploration of #icanhazpdf Requests. ACRL 2015 ; March 25-28, 2015; Portland, Oregon 2015. Available at http://eprints.rclis.org/24847/.
Thanks to everyone who participated in the #AMillionDecisions chat, and in particular to Alison Day and Sarah Hennessy for leading us, and to Nick Poole, CEO of CILIP for his participation. The transcript and analytics are now available, thanks to Symplur, if you weren’t able to take part, or want to refresh your memory.
We think it was the biggest #ukmedlibs chat so far, with 47 participants, and over a million tweet impressions.
In October we’ll be talking about the phenomena variously known as guerilla open access, black open access or shadow libraries: for example, #icanhazpdf, Library Genesis or, most (in)famously, Sci-Hub.
Questions and resources will be posted here before the chat.
Every day across the healthcare sector in England more than a million decisions are made that have a profound and lasting impact on people’s lives and which influence the quality of healthcare and the cost of services.
CILIP and Health Education England (HEE) are campaigning for decisions in the healthcare sector to be fully evidence-based, calling on government and health service providers to employ and make use of the skills of librarians and knowledge specialists in meeting their obligations under The Health and Social Care Act 2012.
You can see how people have been getting involved so far by searching the #AMillionDecisions hashtag on Twitter.
On Tuesday 19th September at 8pm, we go online to talk about the campaign, how you are getting involved and what can be done to support you to promote it.
We’ll structure the chat around the following questions:
- How are you engaging with the #AMillionDecisions campaign?
- What examples of impact are you using to promote the campaign?
- Are you connecting with and promoting The Health and Social Care Act 2012, if so, how?
- What is the value of connecting into your professional body around advocacy and this campaign?
- What support is needed to drive the value of this campaign strategically in your Trust?
- How might the #AMillionDecisions campaign be useful to you?
- Where do we take this from here?
There’s no #ukmedlibs chat tonight as we take a summer break. We’ll be back at 8pm on Tuesday 19th September, when we’ll be talking about #AMillionDecisions with guests Sarah Hennessy and Alison Day. We’ll post more here before the chat.
The transcript and analytics of July’s chat on patient and public involvement are now available, thanks to Symplur. Thanks to everyone who participated, and to Holly Case for leading it.
We’ll take a break in August, but will be back in September, refreshed, to talk about #amilliondecisions
Here’s the transcript and analytics for the June 2017 chat, Professional development – are you up to scratch?
Thanks, everyone who took part, and especially @hollingtonn for leading the discussion.
Resources mentioned in the chat:
And, though no one mentioned it in the chat itself, and it compared the old, 2007 MLA competencies with the PKSB, this article by @aalawton and Jane Burns is rewarding reading:
Lawton A, Burns J. A review of competencies needed for health librarians–a
comparison of Irish and international practice. Health Info Libr J. 2015
Jun;32(2):84-94. doi: 10.1111/hir.12093. Epub 2014 Dec 30
July’s chat will be at 8pm BST on Tuesday 18th July.
Thanks to everyone who participated in the April chat, on information literacy. The transcript and analytics are now available, with thanks to Symplur.
Next month, at 8 pm on Tuesday 16 May, Tracey Pratchett and Victoria Treadway will lead a chat on the Making Alignment a Priority (MAP) toolkit. More soon, in the meantime you can follow the MAP Toolkit on Twitter.
It’s the week after the LILAC conference, so tonight we go online to talk about information literacy in health libraries. To stimulate thought, have a look at the LILAC 2017 archive – in particular two papers by Pip Divall, Critical reading made easy and Writing for publication: using training and blogs to promote publishing in a hospital trust (there was also one by Emily Hurt,Facilitating research amongst radiographers through information literacy workshops, but it’s not yet available on the LILAC site) and, of course, SCONUL’s Seven Pillars of Information Skills.
Questions for tonight:
Q1. Information literacy has been described as a key compenent of evidence-based practice. Do we agree?
Q2. Can we make any assumptions about the information literacy levels of health professionals? Do newly qualified doctors, nurses and other professions come to us with adequate information literacy levels?
Q3. New opportunities for teaching information literacy: have you developed new courses to meet new needs, for example in using social media, or teaching reflective writing?
Q4. Were you at LILAC, or following from afar on Twitter? What were your impressions?
Q5. Patients and the public: do health librarians have a role in teaching information literacy to patients and the public?
Q6. Have you been involved in wider literacy activities, for example Books on Prescription or the Six Book Challenge?
So join us online at 8pm tonight, Tuesday 18 April. Please remember to use the #ukmedlibs hashtag when tweeting.
The transcript and analytics of last night’s chat about productivity techniques are now available.
As there were a number of techniques, apps and resources mentioned, we’ve extracted them from the transcript and list them below, in the order they were mentioned:
Also mentioned: pen, paper, music, biscuits and coffee