Thanks to everyone who took part in last night’s chat on open access. The transcript and analytics are now available, thanks to Symplur.
We may only have scratched the surface of a complicated subject, but there were some potentially useful actions: CILIP’s Health Libraries Group undertook to review their position on open access to Health Information and Libraries Journal, EAHIL offered their expertise, whose journal has been open access for some time and recently moved to a new platform, and several of us now have Open Access Week in our diaries.
We takle a break in August, but will be back in September, for what the French call la rentrée. Enjoy the summer.
For July’s chat we’ll be talking about open access, both generally, and as it applies to our own professional literature. Join us online for a chat led by Tom Roper
Open access has been with us for a long time. The Budapest Intiative, the Bethesda statement and the Berlin declaration statements are fifteen or more years old. Yet much of the biomedical literature remains behind paywalls, inaccessible to those who use it and even to those who created it.
As for our own professional literature, while the Journal of the Medical Library Association, The Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l’Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada, and the Journal of the European Association for Health Information and Libraries are all fully open access, our own professional journal, Health Information and Libraries Journal, has yet to support open access fully. The publishers, Wiley, permit self-archiving of pre-print versions, while accepted (peer-reviewed) version may only be self-archived after a 24 month embargo period; authors may use Wiley’s OnlineOpen system, for a fee of $3,000.
The transcript and analytics of our March journal club chat, a discussion of Chu F, Ball A Using Quality Improvement Tools to Redefine a Clinical Librarianship Program: A Case Study J Hosp Libr 2018 1-7 https://doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2018.1400826. Thanks to everyone who participated. Next month’s chat, on library statistics and how to make the best use of them, takes place on Tuesday 17th April at 8 pm.
We haven’t run a Twitter journal club for a while, so for the March chat, at 8 pm on Tuesday 20th March we’ll have a discussion about this paper:
Chu F, Ball A
Using Quality Improvement Tools to Redefine a Clinical Librarianship Program: A Case Study
J Hosp Libr 2018 1-7 https://doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2018.1400826
It’s not open access, but if you ask your document supply colleagues nicely, they should be able to find you a copy.
UPDATE: with thanks to Nikki Dettmar of the #medlibs chats, there’s a copy in the University of Washington’s repository: https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/41616
Ethical principles underlie everything that we do: the choices we make in our own lives and the actions that we take at work. Getting the principles right therefore has wide implications – not just for dry-sounding theory, but for day to day activities.
This #UKMedLibs chat is an opportunity to contribute to CILIP’s Big Conversation reviewing the ethical principles for the professional body. You can find out more about the review here https://archive.cilip.org.uk/news/cilip-s-big-conversation-ethics and you may find it helpful to refresh your awareness of the ethical principles before the chat https://archive.cilip.org.uk/research/topics/ethics-review/existing-ethical-framework
Come to the chat prepared to be honest and reflective!
- Were you aware of the ethical principles (be honest!)?
- How have you applied the ethical principles in your work?
- What do you think are the big ethical issues in healthcare library and knowledge services?
- Do any of the principles need updating (e.g. if new technologies have made a difference)?
- Which would be your top 3 ethical principles to keep?
- Which ethical issues are missing?
- Who do you think should sign up to the ethical principles?
- What would make is easy to apply the ethical principles in your work?
- What feedback would you like to give to CILIP on the ethical principles?
The chat will be led by Ruth Carlyle. Ruth is Policy Officer for the Health Libraries Group, and joined Health Education England in April 2017 as Head of Library & Knowledge Services and Technology Enhanced Learning, HEE Midlands and East. She completed her information science training in the pharmaceutical industry and then moved into the voluntary sector, most recently overseeing Macmillan Cancer Support’s partnership cancer information and support services.
The transcript and analytics of last night’s quiz are now available. Congratulations to our worthy winner, @StephGrey84. A £20 voucher kindly donated by Wolters Kluwer is on its way to you.
If you were baffled by any of our questions, here’s the answers, in italics:
- Name the three people responsible for #ukmedlibs: Holly Case, Sam Burgess and Tom Roper (we accepted names or Twitter handles)
What’s the first line of A Christmas Carol? Marley was dead: to begin with
Which #ukmedlibs chat is considered to be the biggest one so far? #amilliondecisions, September 2017
What is the name of the traditional Italian Christmas cake? Panettone…or panforte
What was the date of our very first #ukmedlibs chat? 19th May 2015
By which date should Christmas decorations be removed? 5th or 6th January [controversial, so we accepted either answer]
Who has just been appointed Vice-President of CILIP for 2018? David Stewart [An answer of the King in the North was also considered correct]
Which country donates a Christmas Tree to the UK every year as token of gratitude for support during WW2? Norway
Who are the leads for the STEP e-learning modules? Sarah Lewis and Tracey Pratchett
According to the traditional song, how many ladies dancing were there? Nine
Which website hosts the #ukmedlibs transcript and analytics? Symplur
And finally, who or what is this? [picture of an elf] Elf on the shelf!
And the answers to the Name that librarian picture round were
June Tabor [folk singer and former library assistant in the London Borough of Haringey’s libraries: no one identified her correctly]
Mao Zedong (or Mao Tse-Tung if you’re old-fashioned like me)
Angus Wilson [novelist, who worked at the British Museum Reading Room]
Georges Bataille [French librarian and writer]
Philip Larkin [though someone thought it was Eric Morecambe]
Leslie Morton [It seems the author of Garrison-Morton, and one of the architects of NHS librarianship as we now know it, is poorly remembered. Read this obituary if you wish to remedy this. I hope people who apply for the bursary set up in his memory ensure they know who he was]
Jorge Luis Borges
A merry Christmas and a happy new year to everyone who’s taken part in our chats in 2017. In the new year we have chats on institutional repositories (16th January) and professional ethics (20th February). If you have ideas for chats, do get in touch. We can help facilitate a chat.
The first ever #ukmedlibs Christmas quiz is now live, with Holly Case at the controls. You can enter in three ways:
- Preferred method, as it makes marking easy: see the questions and submit your answers via the Google form. You’ll need to enter an e-mail address, which we promise we will not share with anyone.
- Watch the @ukmedlibs Twitter account. We’ll tweet the questions one by one, and you can reply with a direct message to us – don’t tweet answers to all and sundry, please. It doesn’t matter if we don’t follow you – we’ve set our account to receive DMs from anyone.
- E-mail your answers to firstname.lastname@example.org
- No Googling. How will we know you haven’t? We won’t, but we hope your professional integrity will stop you
- Holly’s decision on everything is final
- If there’s a tie, we have a tie break question. The first person to submit a correct answer will win,
We’ll do our best to announce the winner at 9, or as soon as we can afterwards.
We’re very grateful to Wolters Kluwer, who have donated a £20 Amazon voucher to be awarded to the winner. If you win, we’ll ask for a postal address to which to send it.
Happy quizzing. from Holly, Sam and Tom
November’s chat takes place at 8 pm on Tuesday 21st November. Earlier this year, Health Education England undertook their bi-annual Development Needs Analysis, looking at the training and development needs of healthcare information professionals in England.
The development team behind the survey are leading the latest #ukmedlibs chat and would like to find out your thoughts about many different aspects of the development needs analysis.
- Have you seen the Development Needs Analysis Report?
- Do you think all development areas were covered in the survey?
- Have you used the results from the DNA in any way?
- Do you think the DNA has made an impact/could make an impact in your region?
- Where does the DNA sit within the wider profession/ can it inform other sectors?
- Do you have any ideas for increasing number of people completing the survey?
- What do you consider to be the most positive outcomes of the Development Needs Analysis?
- Have the DNA results allowed you to plan/attend events which are specific to your locality/region?
Thanks to everyone who took part in a fascinating chat. The transcript and analytics are now available. We look forward to seeing what participants will be doing in next week’s Open Access Week.
Next months’ chat, at 8pm on Tuesday 21st Novermber, will be on the subject if training and development needs,
Thanks to everyone who participated in last night’s chat on the ever-changing NHS landscape, and how the Making Alignment a Priority (MAP) toolkit can help. Thanks in particular to our guest leaders, Tracey Pratchett and Victoria Treadway.
The transcript and analytics are now available from Symplur. To keep up to date with the MAP toolkit, sign up to follow them on Twitter or subscribe to the RSS feed.