Next months’ chat, at 8pm on Tuesday 21st Novermber, will be on the subject if training and development needs,
Inspired by recent exchanges on lis-medical, lis-profession and Medlib-L on the subject of the hashtag #icanhazpdf, used by people asking for copies of papers from scholarly journals, the October chat will discuss the phenomenon variously known as guerilla open access, scholarly piracy or biblioleaks. This is timely: Open Access Week occurs later in the month.
Sharing sites such as SciHub claim to hold over 64.5 million journal articles, freed from paywalls, but publishers take a dim view of their activities and Elsevier and the Amercian Chemical Society (ACS) are suing SciHub.
Questions for discussion:
- Are library users in your organisation using these tools and sites?
- What implications do these tools have for us?
- And what implications do they have for our relationships with publishers?
- What’s the relationship between our campaigns for open access and tools such as these?
- What advice would you give to a library user who asks you if they should use one of these sites?
If you’d like some background reading, try these:
Hoy MB. Sci-Hub: What Librarians Should Know and Do about Article Piracy. Med Ref Serv Q. 2017;36(1):73-8.
Greshake B Looking into Pandora’s Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and its Usage. F1000 Research. 2017;6:541. Available at https://f1000research.com/articles/6-541/v1
Swab M, Romme K Scholarly Sharing via Twitter: #icanhazpdf Requests for Health Sciences Literature. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l’Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada. 2016;37:9-11. Available at https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/jchla/index.php/jchla/article/view/26060/20281
Bohannon J. Who’s downloading pirated papers? Everyone. Science. 2016;352(6285):508-12. Available at http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/352/6285/508.full.pdf
Gardner CC, Gardner G. Bypassing Interlibrary Loan Via Twitter: An Exploration of #icanhazpdf Requests. ACRL 2015 ; March 25-28, 2015; Portland, Oregon 2015. Available at http://eprints.rclis.org/24847/.
Thanks to everyone who participated in the #AMillionDecisions chat, and in particular to Alison Day and Sarah Hennessy for leading us, and to Nick Poole, CEO of CILIP for his participation. The transcript and analytics are now available, thanks to Symplur, if you weren’t able to take part, or want to refresh your memory.
We think it was the biggest #ukmedlibs chat so far, with 47 participants, and over a million tweet impressions.
In October we’ll be talking about the phenomena variously known as guerilla open access, black open access or shadow libraries: for example, #icanhazpdf, Library Genesis or, most (in)famously, Sci-Hub.
Questions and resources will be posted here before the chat.
Every day across the healthcare sector in England more than a million decisions are made that have a profound and lasting impact on people’s lives and which influence the quality of healthcare and the cost of services.
CILIP and Health Education England (HEE) are campaigning for decisions in the healthcare sector to be fully evidence-based, calling on government and health service providers to employ and make use of the skills of librarians and knowledge specialists in meeting their obligations under The Health and Social Care Act 2012.
You can see how people have been getting involved so far by searching the #AMillionDecisions hashtag on Twitter.
On Tuesday 19th September at 8pm, we go online to talk about the campaign, how you are getting involved and what can be done to support you to promote it.
We’ll structure the chat around the following questions:
- How are you engaging with the #AMillionDecisions campaign?
- What examples of impact are you using to promote the campaign?
- Are you connecting with and promoting The Health and Social Care Act 2012, if so, how?
- What is the value of connecting into your professional body around advocacy and this campaign?
- What support is needed to drive the value of this campaign strategically in your Trust?
- How might the #AMillionDecisions campaign be useful to you?
- Where do we take this from here?
There’s no #ukmedlibs chat tonight as we take a summer break. We’ll be back at 8pm on Tuesday 19th September, when we’ll be talking about #AMillionDecisions with guests Sarah Hennessy and Alison Day. We’ll post more here before the chat.
- Delivering a Patient Information Service (a CILIP Health Libraries Group and Patient Information Forum event) October 2017
- Health Information Week (runs from 2-8th July 2018)
- Knowledge for Healthcare patient and public information work-stream
We’ll take a break in August, but will be back in September, refreshed, to talk about #amilliondecisions
Following Health Information Week earlier this month, July’s chat will be on Patient and Public Information (PPI). Since Knowledge for Healthcare was published, in which Patient and Public Information was highlighted as a key are of work, there has been an increased focus on the topic. How has PPI affected you? Are you loving or loathing this focus? Are you seeing positive changes through this work? We will be following the questions below:
- What has your service implemented so far to support the PPI agenda?
- What’s been the most positive thing to come out of your PPI work so far?
- What is the most problematic aspect of PPI for you?
- Did you get involved with Health Information Week? How so?
- Have you built any good relationships out of your PPI work? How would you like to see those develop?
- Do you feel you need additional support to implement PPI in your service? If yes, what?
- Have you used any of the resources put together as part of the Knowledge for Healthcare PPI work stream?
Join us on Tuesday 18th July at 8pm on Twitter using the hashtag #ukmedlibs to discuss Patient and Public Information.